Published: 24 Mar 2018 › Updated: 24 Mar 2018
A Science Denier, or a Science Purist?
I'm not a science denier, but a science purist. I believe in the scientific method's ability to help humanity to further evolve our understanding about ourselves and the world we live in, but I do not believe in any so-called science that has been commissioned to confirm preexisting biases, or to further selfish political and/or financial gains.
#science #confirmationbias #sciencedenier #scientificmethod #unityprocess #inductivereasoning #followthemoney
Leave A Science Denier, or a Science Purist? to:
Best Posts From Nathan Martin
We have not curated any of unityprocess's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From Nathan Martin
- UnSpun 186 – Nathan Martin "Empathetic Reasoning and the Trivium"
- Ayn Rand - Altruism and Capitalism
- God given Rights vs Gov't Created Rights
- Almost Every Major Franchise is Compromised
- The "Smart" Side of History
- Michael Crichton on Scientific Consensus
- Multiculturalism, Integration, and Displacement
- Notable Carroll Quigley Quotes from Tragedy and Hope
- Winning the Culture War
- Scapegoat Theory
- The Psychotic Left: From Jacobin France to the Occupy Movement
- John Taylor Gatto on the Purpose of Public Schooling
- The Importance of Proper Communication
- Request a Channeling with Aline
- History Of The Frankfurt School - Political Correctness and Cultural Marxism
- CNET'S ARTICLE BACKFIRES HILARIOUSLY
- Doomcock's Laws of Canon: A Culture War Manifesto
- Trump's plan for civics test for legal entrants could keep out highly-skilled immigrants, experts say
- The Left's Use of Name Calling as a Means of Getting Their Way
- Are your viewpoints based in philosophy, or ideology?