
Layer 2 is not layer 2 without layer 1 security
I have seen people call Hivemind a "layer 2", and non-chalantly calling to move more of the blockchain to layer 2.
For "real" layer 2, there needs to be fraud proofs or validation proofs that verifies everything on layer 2 with the same security and consensus mechanisms of layer 1. You have to tread very carefully moving stuff outside the blockchain. Otherwise, these are just hybrid centralized solutions.
See: optimistic rollups and plasma (fraud proofs) or zk Rollups (validation proofs) on ethereum for how it works.
Where are the fraud proofs or validation proofs for Hivemind? If I'm not mistaken, it's just a centralized database expressing parts of the blockchain in a more efficient manner.
As mentioned before, I'm very disappointed by the direction HF24 has taken, and will no longer trust this network and the witnesses running it, until I'm shown the mechanisms used to secure layer 2 with layer 1 consensus.
Leave Layer 2 is not layer 2 without layer 1 security to:
Read more #hive posts
Best Posts From liberosist
We have not curated any of liberosist's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From liberosist
- I'll be there for Eth2 Phase 0 genesis
- For Hive to succeed, stakeholders need to not be completely delusional cultists
- Layer 2 is not layer 2 without layer 1 security
- Resigning from witnessing permanently
- Reminder: Hive desperately needs a complete overhaul - it's the only way
- Understanding why bitcoin and ethereum have high fees, and sustainable solutions
- Thoughts on Reddit's Community Points scaling solutions
- F1 2020 Review
- AMD has achieved the unthinkable - 25x20
- It's finally happening - Apple moves macOS to Arm