Leprechaun avatar

Mann-ipulating Science: Sloppy Work, or Scientific Bias?

leprechaun

Published: 11 Jan 2022 › Updated: 11 Jan 2022Mann-ipulating Science: Sloppy Work, or Scientific Bias?

Mann-ipulating Science: Sloppy Work, or Scientific Bias?

image.png

Science is for sale.

The video mentions these five things:

  • Truncation of Data
  • Obsolete Data
  • Geographical Data
  • Manufacture of Data
  • Use of incorrect statistical methods

In the video Wrightstone mentions a statistical method that produces hockey sticks. I would have liked to see a little more detail on why that was but I know that sometimes these math topics can be quite involved.

Tree ring data growth is a bad proxy in most cases. The only cases where it is good is when the temperature is the great inhibitor of growth. Now carbon dioxide is a significant helper for plant growth in general. By using tree ring data from cool, warm or hot places; they are taking a proxy for carbon-dioxide as a proxy for temperature, and then using that to show a correlation between carbon-dioxide and temperature.

Leave Mann-ipulating Science: Sloppy Work, or Scientific Bias? to:

Written by

An Economist, a Coder and a Carbonist. Author of https://Steemfiles.com, Author of https://ProofofBrain.blog Carbonist community admin (https://www.proofofbrain.blog/created/hive-139995). Discord: leprechaun#2185 Email: theleprechaun2022@steemfiles.com Lover of freedom

Read more #hive-139995 posts


Best Posts From Leprechaun

We have not curated any of leprechaun's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.

More Posts From Leprechaun