
A STATUTE IS NOT A LAW
But it is a "prima facie" evidence of the law, so it has a force of law, UNLESS it is rebutted by EVIDENCE that you're NOT a person whom the legislature intended to, or can regulate. (My explanation).
For example, State Citizens and Inhabitants have no contract with a State, so the State CAN'T regulate them unless they engage in COMMERCE.
A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).�A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
Leave A STATUTE IS NOT A LAW to:
Read more #freeman posts
Best Posts From jaro
We have not curated any of jaro's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.