British creativity and international trade
Over 6 months ago, I decided to see how true the proposition that Creative Industries are foreign exchange earners for the economy as claimed by British Music and the Shadow Culture team.
I asked my MP to ask a written question and the replies are linked to in a comment on the above article. I asked for a broader range of industry classifications as I was interested in broader questions than just the creative industry.
I think this is OK i.e. I think the chart is validly constructed.
EMI was sold to Sony & Universal in 2012 and so their balance of trade position was probably reversed at that time and then they were a competitively large music publisher. I last looked at the structure of the global music industry a long time ago: pre-streaming, pre-Apple and pre-Spotify (which is incorporated in Sweden).
Five years out of nine, the industry was in deficit. The final year surplus is extraordinarily large, it would be good to see 2017/2018 and/or understand the reasons for this number. My conclusion is that it is not historically true to say that the Creative industries are a net contributor to the UK foreign exchange account.
It's disappointing that the figures stop two and bit years ago.
Leave British creativity and international trade to:
Read more #economics posts
Best Posts From Dave
We have not curated any of davelevy's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From Dave
- Blair's Shadow, or that of New Labour
- British creativity and international trade
- Brexshite, there is no Lexit
- New Governance rules for Labour CLPs
- Some influences on political economy
- Europe's New Copyright law, maybe
- Surveillance, ignorance and a chilling effect
- Big Copyright in the European Parliament
- Macroeconomic Policy in the EU
- E-Voting? Why not!