CONTINUED: Mueller Probe Closed

Exoneratist’s first study of the Mueller Report deals with the false statements, lawlessness, spying, bias, conspiracy, rush to judgment, abandonment of objectivity, gross negligence, and political clout, of:

a. certain former and present members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
b. certain former and present members of the Department of Justice (DOJ),
c. former President Barack Obama, and
d. former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The first individual studied was Andrew Weissmann, one of the Mueller Report’s top investigators. The second individual, to be studied below, is John O. Brennan, CIA Director from March, 2013 to January, 2017.

The significance of CIA Director John O. Brennan’s impact on the Mueller Report rests in his constant verbal attacks, political challenges and rude criticisms utilizing false facts to impugn the personal character, the Presidential Campaign, and the Presidential Office of Donald J. Trump.

1st example:

Brennan, knew the Steele Dossier was a complete hoax, full of unverified information. And yet he passed the Dossier to Harry Reed in a meeting on August, 2016, and thereby set up false narratives, concerning Trump. These narratives were sent through Congress and the media to the American people. These narratives suggested there was collusion between Trump and Russia and often implied treasonous attempts by Trump to use Russian influence to win his presidential election. Of course, no collusion was found in the Mueller Report, but Brennan was paramount in this conspiracy theory that was never proven. On May 15, 2019, Former U.S. Attorney and Special Counsel Joe diGenova stated: “The core of this conspiracy began with John Brennan and ends with John Brennan. This is very serious business and for the first time, I now believe that some of these guys (James Comey, John Brennan and James Clapper) are going to prison . . .”

2nd example:

Numerous times on TV media and Social media, Brennan battered Obama’s successive administration (Trump) with extreme partisan political attacks. Such verbal attacks by Brennan were also made on the Trump Presidential Campaign. And more recently Brennan has been working as a national security analyst for MSNBC and NBC News. Thus, Brennan ignored the fact that due to maintaining US Security, NO PRESENT NOR FORMER CIA intelligence agency members should ever influence or give advice stating partisan political views. Brennan has therefore set a precedent that should not go forward regarding CIA agency members. In the best interest of the United States, Trump is said to have attempted to revoke Brennan’s Security Clearance, but the Exoneratist has not been able to verity that this actually occurred.

3rd example:

In the first example above, it is obvious that Brennan was relying on the Steele Dossier in order to carry out the collusion conspiracy against Donald Trump. But in May, 2017, Brennan falsely testified in Congress that he neither knew who commissioned the Dossier nor did the CIA rely on the Dossier as fact. These false denials, then, bring Brennan front and center as possibly one of the accused persons in the ongoing DOJ investigation of abuse surrounding the FISA COURT warrants. The DOJ Inspector General, Michael E. Horowitz, is leading this investigation in order to enforce the laws and administer justice regarding warrants that allowed surveillance of Carter Page in the Mueller Probe.

Next the Exoneratist will study Comey and Clapper, who are mentioned in the above 2nd example by Joe diGenova.