Capital does not exist under every system
The definition of the word capital is private ownership of the means of production. The means of production do exist under every system, that is true. Private ownership, on the other hand, does not exist under every system. The basis of private property is control of something that you intend to extract profit from, and do not intend to use yourself. Your car and your computer are not private property. The same factory may be private property one day, and not be the next.
You could say anything has the potential to be capital, but that's a pretty useless statement.
Leave Capital does not exist under every system to:
Best Posts From AnarchyHasNoGods
We have not curated any of anarchyhasnogods's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From AnarchyHasNoGods
- so hows life going yall?
- man kidnaps and strangles women telling her he is going to kill her, all for sexual gratification, is given stern warning by judge, no jail time
- Steemits coming of age - contest at the bottom, guess when steemit will "come of age"
- being away
- Capital does not exist under every system
- This is not a democratic society, this is a capitalist society.
- Trump made it legal to beat and rape people not too long ago, and yet nobody is talking about it
- Watch out, the socialists are coming
- A message that cannot be stated enough times
- Telemarketers are interesting, sometimes I end up listening to them for something to think about