Something Forming Something - Big Bang Limits... It's A Scientific Frontier

source

Usually when we talk about the beginning of the universe and everything that we came to meet as human beings, practically everything we describe as nature, there are multiple schools of thought.

Some believe there's a God that creates everything and some believe there's no God and that there's no need for a God for creation to happen

This is quite a sensitive topic because it's the very foundation of religions on it. I for one was born into a Christian home and was taught at an early age about God. I attend church ceremonies and follow mostly the moral values of the Bible.

However, I always try to leave room in my mind for all other opinions. I never discriminate and never hate on other religions. Now that's not me saying I'm not a strong believer but as science would suggest, you need to always keep asking questions.

Another opinion about creation is the Big Bang theory. Just try explaining the big bang theory ot a strong believer, whether a Christian or Muslim or any other diet believing religion and you're going to start hearing one single trend of questions.

Well if the bug bang happened, who started it?

This question only comes because by default, we've been trained to believe that something must always come from something else and our entire environment is designed on the law of cause and effect. I don't doubt that at all. Yes we should question it. Who or what started the big bang theory?

The honest scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson will humbly respond with: We don't know. That's a whole frontier if Science and infact if we knew the answer the whole world might change forever.

Here's the thing that gets me thinking. How come we know from sure that the creation story of the universe is just one story and yet we allow ourselves to believe in multiple stories and religions. The reason multiple religions exist is because we don't have the answer to what started the big bang.

Yes we know for sure there was a big bang but what started it is something we're yet to discover. There are lots and lots of theories or opinions regarding this but we don't know for sure yet.

This is what makes a scientist a true scientist and different from an atheist. The true scientist does not doubt the existence of God or accepts it. They only operate on scientific proves leading to facts.

I hope I don't get too controversial with this statement but you see when we talk about big bang theory, the religious person immediately starts questioning it. Who do you think started the big big. Something had to be made by something.

But you see the minute you ask well who or what created the something that created the big bang? That's a question they usually don't want you to ask. Because based on the principle of something from something, the scientists seems to have every right to ask where did God come from or what created him.

The religious person reserves the right to say it's a mystery, however some of them don't allow the scientists to reserve the same rights and say we don't know yet. They immediately jump into conclusions that the scientists are ignorant so that means there's God.

Now I'll put this disclaimer, I'm not doubting anything but merely using this as an example to explain my point.

• Here's the main point.

Yes it seems the universe is structured in such a way that something must always come out from something else. The problem is does that something have to be what the religious person describes. And what if there's a whole aspect of the universe that has eluded as for generations which might be the perfect answer to the question: what or who started the big bang?