What do we think about correspondence?

Correspondence is mind boggling. The more imperative the relationship, the more mind boggling it is.

Correspondence is 2-way - it includes both talking and tuning in.

Correspondence is found out; consequently solid examples CAN be scholarly. We're not casualties to negative examples of correspondence.

Correspondence is unavoidable. It's difficult to NOT impart. Indeed, even quietness is a type of correspondence. So the inquiry isn't whether we will convey however how we will correspondence.
Correspondence can manufacture the relationship or tear it down. Research by John Gottman demonstrates that we should have no less than 5 positive minutes together for each 1 negative if our marriage is to be steady.

This is a 5:1 proportion of positive versus negative interchanges and shared encounters.