
The important bit here is being able to very clearly distinguish between "EXISTS" and "DOES NOT EXIST" (does not qualify as extant).
(IFF) you have no empirical evidence (and cannot demonstrate some logical necessity) of "spiritual-wind" (THEN) you cannot categorize "spiritual-wind" in the "EXISTS" category.
Certainly there might be (currently undiscovered) things that will be said to "EXIST" in the future, and we might even RETROACTIVELY say they "EXISTED" "before" they were "discovered", but up-to-and-until that day when they are empirically verifiable (and or demonstrated to be logically necessary) we cannot say "spiritual-wind" "EXISTS".
Radio waves are a good example of this.
Leave to:
Read more # posts
Best Posts From LOGICZOMBIE
We have not curated any of logiczombie's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From LOGICZOMBIE
- Blurt Publisher - a WordPress plugin to automatically publish your posts to the Blurt platform!
- blurthaven_v1.7.html
- 제목: 도덕경 맨뼈 번역 — 곽점 죽간과 마왕퇴 비단 사본에서 본 가장 오래된 도덕경
- 道德經 - TAO TE CHING - v9.3
- 道德經 - TAO TE CHING - v9.3
- REEL
- "9/11 Papers" MegaLeak - Layer 2 + Checkpoint 08: Cyber-Cash For Cyber-Cache by thedarkoverlord
- New Potting Soil And Cannabis Transplants
- Downvotes gegen D-A-CH am 24.10. - Schadensbegrenzung (2/2)
- Hivemind API being updated to allow following mute lists