Ending the disastrous 2020 allow us to compare official numbers with with frenzied propaganda. At last, we don’t have to guess what the death rate from the ‘deadly’ virus really is…
Thank God, as times go by, the coronavirus hoax is becoming obvious to ever larger number of people who are ready to do something about it. Here is a poster from Croatia calling for a popular protest against the political-media dictatorship, for the overthrow of the current government and ‘health’ measures:
People there are not stupid not to see the obvious manipulation aimed at stripping them of all elementary freedoms and human rights. Look at this, for example: Deutche Welle reports from the meeting of German and Turkish foreign ministers with two different photos. For the German public they wear masks, for Turkish public they do not wear masks:
So, by simply scaling the numbers, we come to the conclusion that the number of about 500 deaths a day inside the gerontology homes homes in Italy is a completely normal thing. Maybe even more, because Italy has the oldest population in the European Union. But the media did not present it to us as normal as they spread hysteria about the virus.
7.840.000.000 / 1.826.917 = 4291,38 One out of 4291 persons or 0,0233%
0,0233% Let that sink in…
Yes, you read that right: This ‘deadly’ disease kills only one in 4290 people. It is true that the virus has not yet been isolated by anyone and that it cannot yet be proven that any of those 1,826,917 people are really the victims of that virus and not something else, but even if we take it as it is from those fraudsters, the death rate is criminally low to justify introduction of a cruel measures of deprivation of liberty, measures of destruction of the economy, and practically, elimination of truly sick people who have been denied the necessary medical assistance due to the corona theater.
If the state really cared about the health of the population, it would close tobacco factories, because more than seven million people die annually from the consequences of smoking:
Statistical reasons are not the only ones that break the sinister vaccination scam. This can also be seen through the ‘control population’ of asylum seekers entering the European Union and the UK living in appalling circumstances:
Duration: 5:33
If the virus was so deadly, they would be the first to die en masse. However, nothing is happening amongst their population. The estimated number of asylum seekers in Serbia is somewhere between 50,000 and 80,000. And lo and behold, the Serbian Minister of the Interior, Vulin, concludes: “It is a real miracle that there is not a single case of Covid among them!’ A miracle, indeed!
The goal of the ‘health measures’ was never to protect the health of the population, but quite the opposite: it’s the elimination of the weakest with a little help from vaccines, as shown by the case from the home for the elderly in Sabac. This is the reason why even the mention of free choice regarding vaccination in the media is treated as a crime, anyone who dares to mention truth be told, he is being dragged through the media mud, and vaccination is currently being pushed in the form of blackmail, with the threat of coercion:
The next important thing provoking doubt about vaccines are the obvious lies about their content and the disclaimer of the manufacturer from responsibility for any consequences. Why do manufacturers not report the content of vaccines and disclaim responsibility if they work in the health service? The answer is clear. They do it because they know how their ‘science’ affects human body, and one part of the answer lies in the greater resistance of people to the use of aborted fetal cells for the development of vaccines, which according to many, especially the religious majority, is completely unethical. Instead of at least some arguments opposing such an opinion, we only get disgusting lies of ‘fact-checkers’ with a reference to the producers! What an idea: Let’s ask the fox guarding the chicken coop about the missing chickens!
A standard lie of ‘factcheckers’ (a censors in reality) is that they do not use aborted fetal cells, but cloned lines derived from the cells taken in 1966 and 1973. They say there wasn’t any aborted fetal cells extraction since. This is an ordinary lie debunked at this link.
The following message is circulating on the Internet these days:
If I get vaccinated:
Can I stop wearing a mask? Govt.: No.
Can I open restaurants, cafes, bars, etc. and work as usual again? Govt.: No.
Am I resistant to covid then? Govt.: Maybe, but we don’t know exactly yet…
Is it at least certain that I can't infect others? Govt.: No, you can still transmit the virus; no one knows for sure.
If all children are vaccinated, will normal school classes return? Govt.: No.
If I get vaccinated, can I stop keeping my distance? Govt.: No.
If I get vaccinated, can I stop hand disinfection? Govt.: No.
If my grandfather and I get vaccinated, can we hug? Govt.: No.
After the vaccine appeared, will it be possible to go to the cinema, theater and stadium again? Govt.: No.
Can vaccinated people gather again at events and parties? Govt.: No.
What is really achieved by vaccination? Govt.: You will not die from the virus.
Are you sure I won’t die from the virus? Govt.: No.
If, statistically speaking, I will not die from the virus anyway, why would I get vaccinated at all? Govt.: To protect others.
So if I get vaccinated, it is one hundred percent certain that I cannot infect others? Govt.: No, we are not sure about that.
So, the covid vaccine:
Does not provide immunity;
Does not eliminate the virus;
Does not prevent death;
It does not guarantee that you will not get infected;
Does not prevent you from getting infected;
Does not prevent you from transmitting the virus;
Does not exclude the necessity of a travel ban;
Does not exclude the need to shut down the company;
Does not exclude the need for lockdown.
At first glance, the content seems correct, doesn’t it? Maybe such current content should be placed on channel… and gladly shared from there.
*** End of the translation ***
Then what does vaccination guarantee?
Just as consent to wear masks enabled the start of the vaccination campaign, so now vaccination guarantees further loss of rights. Whoever agrees to loss of rights now, will agree again when a ‘new breed’ appears in six months. And will agree if it takes three doses. And will agree to a Covid passport. And will agree to any further nonsense determined by the criminals in power…
All the more encouraging is any future protest against the political-media dictatorship and unfounded medical terror.
We have not curated any of lighteye's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
