Kik vs SEC Part 2, The SEC Fires Backs
Last week I wrote about Kik and its potential battle with the SEC.
Kik is adamant that its cryptocurrency, KIN, is not a security.
And in anticipation of a battle with the SEC it launched Defend Crypto, a crowdfund for its defense.
Careful what you wish for… because the SEC fired back today.
Today the SEC sued Kik over its $100 million ICO in 2017.
The SEC is asking a federal NY court to force Kik to refund the ICO and pay interest and penalites.
According to the SEC:
The ICO was a “Hail Mary” effort by Kik to raise funds so it wouldn’t run out of money.
Before the token sale Kik had consulted with the Ontario Securities Commission, who said Kik likely needed to comply with securities laws.
Kik’s claim that KIN was a utility token was disingenuous.
According to Kik CEO Ted Livingston, “This is not about KIN; this is about crypto broadly.”
Well, at the very least we’re getting some action from the SEC.
For more on cryptos follow me @g-dubs and on SteemFollower
or Abra
and trade cryptos on Binance and Bibox...
And delegate SP with MinnowBooster
Leave Kik vs SEC Part 2, The SEC Fires Backs to:
Read more #bitcoin posts
Best Posts From g-dubs
We have not curated any of g-dubs's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From g-dubs
- Crypto OGs Trace Mayer and Caitlin Long Talk Government and Bitcoin
- Interview With Sergey Nazarov, Founder of Chainlink (LINK)
- Trace Mayer on Claiming Your Monetary Sovereignty
- Joey Krug on Pantera’s Investment Thesis for Augur
- Cryptos and Markets Plunge, Is It Time to Buy Bitcoin?
- Charlie Lee Sets the Record Straight on Litecoin
- Interview with Saifedean Ammous, Author of The Bitcoin Standard
- Interview with Rune Christensen of Maker DAO – The Central Bank of Web 3.0
- When Lambo?
- The Top Blockchains for Enterprises