Disproportionately unequal.

Let's see:

You support laws that make it illegal to get your stuff anyway other than through Amazon and you act irate when Amazon has record profits.

You insist that we tank the economy and act surprised when poverty goes up.

Then, after poverty goes up, you act surprised when crime goes up.

You support the passing of tons of draconian laws which are often contradictory and demand that police enforce them while calling for the police to be defunded or abolished and act surprised when there are more interactions with cops.

You adhere to the Critical Race Theorist idea that racism is systemic and any law that produces racism inequity is racist. The lockdowns had an inequitable result; but, since you openly ridiculed the opponents we're not allowed to look at those laws that you supported through the lens of systemic racism. No, the laws by your definition weren't the problem. The system that you support isn't the problem. It's just the cops who are racist.

People said directly to me that I was supporting a genocide for opposing the lockdowns. Well, even if that were true, which is it's not, but even if it were, the great thing about viruses is that they really don't care about race, gender, or social status. Tanking the economy does effect people disproportionately. So, by your definition, at least my policy isn't racist and yours is.

The thing is, you do have to be pretty dumb to not notice that you've been contradiction yourselves. Only, I don't think that most of you are that dumb. I think that a lot of you do want an economy in which we're all wards of the state and you don't care about telling the truth so long as you can achieve your goal of destroying our free society.