firstamendment avatar

Do not forget what the feminist left calls a good rape.

firstamendment

Published: 25 Mar 2022 › Updated: 25 Mar 2022Do not forget what the feminist left calls a good rape.

Do not forget what the feminist left calls a good rape.

Certain circumstances comes up where I am reminded of an old wnd article on the first edition of the v* [female nono parts] monologues.

Perhaps during the senate confirmation hearings of Ketanji Brown Jackson, bringing this up now may be of greater importance-but I doubt too many people will read-let alone people of influence. I don't believe most gay people are evil, but I do believe that most are victims of sexual abuse by predators and many have adopted maladaptive behavior that they try to convince others to accept as normal. While I accept there are those who might have genuine concern about the mental health of gay students in school, I also believe there is a problem with the lgbt community in our schools and universities grooming and raping young kids/adults also. Due to recent events, I think it is more the latter than the former complete with brainwashing techniques.

Brainwashing is such a harsh word and I think that before this week I would not have used that term; you might lose a loved one to some kind of lesbian group under what might best be described as cult like practices including severe isolation, cutting her off from all verbal communication , persecutorial delusions, repeating [weak] talking points in electronic communications, efforts to try to emotionally distance her from you, trying to exert emotional control over the parent including using fear of punishment, and of course telling her that these lesbians love and support her. No one thinks the victim is actually writing these things; it sounds more like something from a boilerplate and just doesn't make sense.


source:freaks (1932)

Feminist and other liberal groups try to monopolize certain words and ideas, allowing them to monopolize certain viewpoints within their own circles. I recognize that rape is evil, and throughout civilized history the punishment have included death, severe fines, severe prison sentences, and maybe castrations were practiced; But celebrated in feminist literature is called a "good rape". As they pound into us the idea that we need to learn that rape is bad, and install stickers in our bathrooms saying the power to stop rape is in our hands, it may be more of a projection of their own perversion. It is said that all white knights are rapists because they project what they hate about themselves onto other men (strawpersons) and when they can't score with the lesbians they resort to rape, so it is also reasonable to consider the case of women white knights. It might seem strange that they are projecting their actual desires that they acknowledge as wrong into punishing all men while celebrating a "good rape" when they do it, but it might involve some sort of mental gymnastics to cleanse themselves their own desires by similarly attacking male strawpersons....like the traditional male white knight. The trigger mechanism in the lesbians might be different, but they also live perpetually in their own rape culture-which no on else can find anywhere- that celebrates the "good rape"; so it is only bad [to them] when men do it-not when they do it hence they don't need to be frustrated.
As told in the "The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could", a 24 year old woman drugged and raped a 13 year old girl, effectively teaching her that she doesn't need a man and the 13 year old believes it to be a good rape. Quite literally the feminist culture celebrates lesbian pedophilia if the rape changes their victim's path away from men, and they embrace lesbianism. And these were among the stories being told in plays across the country, especially at colleges, being celebrated everywhere by the feminist movement for the last 30 some years. Conservatives weren't allowed to criticize it on campus. It is not unreasonable to infer that 3rd wave intersectional feminist (which might include Ketanji Brown Jackson), recognizes the importance of pedophiles to propagate their ideology which is why Jackson is too lenient on them-but obviously can't just cut them loose due to the backlash.

https://valleyadvocate.com/2009/02/26/of-coochie-snorchers-and-the-good-rape/
see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vagina_Monologues
see also http://www.wendymcelroy.com/rockwell/mcelroy000403.html

I am of course not advocating that people discriminate against gays nor take their torches and pitchforks to kick the lgbt adults out of the schools. But I am leaving an anecdotal tale, with some historical background, so that parents might know what to be on the look out for; And if they are able to recognize this to try to save your kids, and criminally prosecute the bad actors out there. Sadly, once a delusion has set in then it might be too late as delusions are hard to break-and you could lose your kid to this lbgt cult as the Hearst family lost Patty to another socialist cult.

I think some of the things parents should look out for in terms of rhetoric are:
painful insults meant specifically to divide/isolate a family.
the arguments will include that being gay means caring about other people.
they will tell you that they are gay, then demand that you accept them for what they are.
they might even claim they are afraid you will kick them out for being gay.
They will say they need the emotional support of their friends and cut the family off.

Since when does caring about someone involve stimulating of the....ahem, try to keep this pg-13. This decades old argument about "caring for someone" is perhaps the most retarded the lgbt community makes. raising ["caring for"] chickens doesn't make someone a:


-source: south park, chickenlover

Obviously some other red flags to look out for is membership in gay, diversity, inclusive, equity type organizations. It is fine to philosophically teach tolerance, but they don't need to be members of groups more infiltrated by child predators than NAMBLA to get the point across. Sadly, it is my understanding the lesbian mafia infiltrated a college christian organization on campus to prey upon vulnerable christian women. When you think about who universities are inclined to hire for staff or their regulations for recognization of student organizations, you know that they have to conform to the universities ideals on diversity, inclusion, tolerance, etc, which means the devil has a front row seat to corrupt God's flock of children. "It is better to caste a millstone around thy neck and drown at sea, than mislead my children"-Jesus.

Supposing you recognize that your kid has been brainwashed by an lgbt cult, what do you do. if they are a minor, I would recommend getting the police involved ASAP if possible. If they are an adult kid in college, I suppose the best thing to do is to undermine their attempts to isolate and maintain control over your kids. Of course, going over and physically removing your kid could reinforce any delusions and increase the headache by causing resentment.
The state of being brainwashed is a pretty much a mental illness, and the focus, I would think, needs to be on rehabilitation[deprogrammming] to cure that mental illness. Delusions are hard to break, and if they are convinced they are gay then I would think just let it go-especially when a perceived parental denial of this state might be a pillar to the formation/reinforcement of persecutorial delusions which might be the attackers vector of control and isolation. The more the fundamental means of control and isolation are exposed as lies, it might be easier for the victim to recognize on their own that the attacker was an abuser and end the relationship. Even if it doesn't result in a collapsed of a relationship, it might be a step in removing the attackers ability to control and isolate the victim.
Even if you have a sincerely held religious belief that homosexuals will go to hell, The first stage still has to include removing the attackers ability to isolate and control your kid. You might only have a small window to save your kid from the attackers means of control, but upon his/her liberation you then have a lifetime, however long or short that might be, to try to save his soul.

Leave Do not forget what the feminist left calls a good rape. to:

Written by

Hive is not a place for free speech, you have a social credit score that destroys your reputation and could hide your posts-and push you back to traditional social media. When someone using the name first amendment has to tell you that, having been chased off on the irrational whims of the gatekeepers, you know things are bad. Consider also that one of the main whales, a Dan Notestein, operates a non-profit called peer verity that seems to be some kind of censorship tool. So when you hear that Hive/block chain is a place for free speech, don't believe it. The audience you'll find off chain is larger than you'll ever find on chain, I'v steer national debates countless times across all media platforms multiple times-including top network Tv stations and the international press. You can't do that in w3, the ecosystem doesn't support that yet-and at the present moment x, or twitter, on w2 has the present dynamics. On hive, You are a tree in a forest, on some deserted island thousands of miles from anywhere-and hive watchers, or should we say valueplan, don't want anyone on the mainland know we exist. If you want to be heard, You have to know something about how the media business works-and they are not here. So whether you make a quarter on hive for a post, or your self-vote is worth hundreds of dollars, nothing you say here will ever be deemed important at the present dynamics. Valueplan can spend millions of dollars for marketing to attract tourist to this island, only for their tourist to step in a steemy pile of bull s___, and be served that same pile of s__ for dinner, and leave telling others how bad the experience was. You believed in hive and its potential, but the governance and their censorship arm doesn't believe in you-they'll even destroy entire communities just because the community leaders were trying to tolkenize developing a community here, when there is hardly anyone left anyways. They are not thankful people use this platform, they are actively hostile to it. The dynamics of hive governance has to change if it is to have a future, otherwise you are wasting your time-and money. Many of those behind hive governance got into crypto early effectively winning the lottery, many were part of a prior chain called bitshares, and were part if the notorious ninjamining about a decade ago. In essence they hit the lottery and have money and power, they don't know how to operate a business to the public, and despite having no merit they think they are better than you. They already destroyed bit shares, hive is next if they remain in control. This same team is behind valueplan, responsible for attracting new users-or so they claim. Since they exhausted the market in the developed world and started the bright idea of onboarding the third world-which is unlikely to have water, electricty, internet, and disposable income. Nothing against them, but this is not a solid investment plan, something where people are more likely to liquidate the new assets released from the DAO. The average IQ is typically about retarded to put it mildly, so the expectation for them to stake hive dollars and have a stablecoin is laughable, and what to do with them other than to liquidate them below fair market value. It should also be noted that Dan notesteins planned charity on bit shares, that he hates government regulations, and it is fair comment to assume the Value of hive is being destroyed to run''s Dan's charity. While valueplan is full of fraud and waste itself, the bulk of the existing governance is a fraud not interested in developing a community-but in destroying it for their own power or financial gain. I seen the price tank from when hivewatchers targetted me, from 20-40 cents, down to a about dime now. If something happens badly to bitcoin or crypto, particularly a systemic threat to the crypto market (like say the democrats winning an election), or if the current dynamics continue then expect to see further declines. I haven't seen "the Koreans" try to market manipulate the coin in ages, did they lose interest in hive too? You see the whales pretending to care about the bleeding through the dao, particularly with value plan, but they offer nothing of substance to fix it-"they" need the fraud to continue. They are scared they will soon complete the repeat of what they allowed happen to bitshares. Oh, the distinction is we have a hair cut rule. The hair cut rule might prevent infinite coins, but it will not stop the complete devaluation of the chain. Hive will not be saved through the current governance, it's impossible. in time, the core projects will not be funded. A decision will have to be made to fire devs, or shut down mission critical projects-whom we probably don't need devs for anyways, let alone multiple full time devs. There will no tangible reward, and the audience is already pretty much non-existent as they've been scared away. It's not like we can fire the current governance, they are lottery winning ninjaminers. When the coin does go to zero, don't expect them to sell a dead coin-dead coins and dead wallets tend to be forgotten about unless new value is found. Dead coins also tend to be delisted. If someone were to try to save it post apocalypse, these whales would come back to restore the old order. If these accounts become dormant (their bots may continue to up/down vote and post AI/reports) as to allow new interest to take over, the first thing that must be done is to find a legal means of rendering them impotent. Not like Justin sun, but perhaps in the form if an air drop to the remaining active community, or to a central planner who can give the community a new direction.

Read more #lgbt posts


Best Posts From firstamendment

We have not curated any of firstamendment's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.

More Posts From firstamendment