Smarter Votes, More Options
The rewards for our posts do not come out of thin air. For that reason, we often feel like a post has been over-rewarded, since for every amount extra given to a post, it is money not available to all the other deserving posts out there.
Our current simple up and down votes are inadequate to express this view. When I initially see a post and it has $0.04, I may give it my upvote because I believe it deserves more than that. Later it may reach $1000, which may be far more than I believe it deserves, but my vote is still contributing to that value.
"Smart-votes" would allow us to express our intentions for the reward pool more clearly. What if I could choose a threshold or range to reward a post, as an alternative to a simple up or downvote? For example, my vote could say "I believe this is worth $100. My vote counts up to $100, but not beyond". Further functionality would include down-voting as well. "I believe this is worth somewhere between $100 and $1000. My upvote counts up to $100 and not beyond. My downvote counts if it goes beyond $1000". Ideally these downvotes would have no impact on reputation, since that is not the intent of the smart-vote.
Leave Smarter Votes, More Options to:
Read more #showerthought posts
Best Posts From demotruk
We have not curated any of demotruk's posts yet. But you can encourage our curation team to review posts by visiting them regularly and by referring other readers. Because we give priority to frequently read content.
More Posts From demotruk
- Biscuit
- HiveFest Doesn't Print Money. Here's What A Decade of Data Says It Does.
- On Forks: What Splitting a Blockchain Does to the Community and the Money
- "Hive" and Six Years of Name Confusion
- Does the App You Start On Predict Whether You Stay?
- What Would A Hive Rebrand Look Like In Practice?
- The 1.8% Who Met In Person Became 18% of Everyone Who Stayed
- The Case For A Rebrand
- Support for Hive Rebrand (In Principle)
- The Slow Death Spiral Has a Root Cause: The Name "Hive"