Lawmaker: ‘It Is Not Anti-Science’ to Hold NIH Accountable for Coverup

Whether justice will be delivered to those involved in the effort to avoid oversight and deflect scrutiny from EcoHealth Alliance’s research at Wuhan is uncertain. What’s clear is that the NIH is a broken institution.

Source: http://www.megalextoria.com/wordpress/index.php/2024/06/11/lawmaker-it-is-not-anti-science-to-hold-nih-accountable-for-coverup/

Early on when there was speculation that COVID-19 had originated in a lab in Wuhan China, this was dismissed as conspiracy theory. However, as time has gone one, the available evidence has pointed more and more towards that as a likely origin. When ties between Wuhan and Dr. Fauci and the NIH were revealed, it was dismissed as more conspiracy thoery. But again, the available evidence suggests otherwise.

However, it's true that there is no absolute proof. Maybe there never will be. Especially when a cover-up seems to be ongoing. More conspiracy theory you say? Then why, for example, does the NIH seem to be working so hard to avoid FOIA requests?

This infomation was reveled during testimony from David Morens, an advisor to the former National Institutes of Health Direcotry Anthony Fauci. In e-mails to various collegues, he mentioned how he knew how to make FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests disappear and so-called "back channels" he had with Dr. Fauci with which to avoid FOIA requirements. If there is nothing to hide, then why work so hard to hide it?

Whether you think it is all baseless conspiracy theory or not, is a little transparency really too much to ask for? How about just complying with the law?